“Is the onfield umpires making movement, is that enough to call over? I’m not sure. Jonny was in his crease then out of his crease.
“I am not disputing the fact it is out because it is out.”
However, Stokes added: “If the shoe was on the other foot I would have put more pressure on the umpires and asked whether they had called over and had a deep think about the whole spirit of the game and would I want to do something like that.
“For Australia, it was the match-winning moment.”
“Would I want to win a game in that manner? The answer for me is no.”
Stokes insisted his blizzard of boundaries – he struck nine fours and nine sixes in total — had not been motivated by anger at the manner of Bairstow’s exit but rather the situation of the match.
“My innings wasn’t a response to the dismissal, it was a response to where the game was,” he said.
“I had to be mindful and strategic about the risk I was going to take and felt my best options was taking the fielders out of play.”
Cummins, meanwhile, insisted he had no regrets over the manner of Bairstow’s dismissal.
“There was nothing untoward or sneaky,” said Cummins, who led Australia’s attack with 3-69.
“Jonny was leaving his crease every ball. He did it four or five balls. You’re meant to stay in your crease in cricket. Bairstow has tried it with a lot of our guys.”
Cummins, asked if there would now be “bad blood” between the sides.
“Not from our team, you might have to ask them (England),” the fast bowler replied.
Cummins, bidding to become the first Australia captain to win an Ashes in England in 22 years, added: “It was a wonderful contest. It’s been a great Ashes series so far.”
(With inputs from AFP)